grc – -Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot 120 Results  www.infosource.gc.ca  Page 9
  ARCHIVÉ - Loi sur l'acc...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
35(1) et (2) : adresser à l'institution et au plaignant un rapport présentant ses conclusions et recommandations, le cas échéant, et recevoir les avis appropriés au besoin. Dans le cas qui nous occupe, cela a été fait : tant la GRC que le demandeur ont été informés que les gestes de la GRC constituaient une enfreinte à la LPRP.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine infosource.gc.ca as primary domain
The only remedy available from the Privacy Commissioner is that outlined in subss. 35(1) and (2): providing to both the institution and the complainant the Commissioner's report outlining its findings and any recommendations, if appropriate, and receiving the appropriate notices where necessary. In the present case, this was done: both the RCMP and the applicant were advised that the RCMP's actions violated the PA. No recommendations were made, therefore the RCMP did not have to respond in kind. The Privacy Commissioner committed no error in not acting further on the applicant's complaint.
  ARCHIVÉ - Loi sur l'acc...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Cette décision renvoie à la déclaration du demandeur déposée à la Cour du Banc de la Reine de l'Alberta contre certains membres de la GRC.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine infosource.gc.ca as primary domain
The decision refers to the applicant's statement of claim filed with the Queen's Bench of Alberta against certain members of the RCMP.
  ARCHIVÉ - Loi sur l'acc...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Cela dit, la Cour a conclu qu'étant donné les circonstances de l'espèce, la décision de la GRC de refuser de communiquer la lettre en date de septembre 1992 était déraisonnable. La Cour s'est fondée sur le fait que le demandeur avait déjà en sa possession une copie de la lettre (qu'il avait obtenue par un moyen autre qu'une demande présentée en vertu de la LPRP) et que l'on pouvait déduire, à partir des dossiers produits devant elle, que la GRC savait que le demandeur en avait une copie avant qu'elle n'en refuse la communication.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine infosource.gc.ca as primary domain
However, the Court held that, given the circumstances of this case, the RCMP's decision to refuse disclosure of the September 1992 letter was unreasonable. The Court based its finding on the fact that the applicant already had a copy of the letter (which he had obtained by means other than his request under the PA) and that it could be inferred, from the records before the Court, that the RCMP knew that the applicant had a copy prior to making its decision to refuse disclosure. The Court added that the objective to be served by not disclosing the applicant's personal information - to protect the sources and nature of sensitive information obtained or prepared in the conduct of a criminal investigation--could no longer be met because the information was already in the applicant's hands. Furthermore, the Court was of the view that, given these particular circumstances, allowing the RCMP's decision to stand would be inconsistent with the purpose of the PA which is not only to provide individuals with access to their personal information but also to protect the privacy of individuals with respect to their personal information. Implicit in this purpose is the right to ensure that one's personal information in records held by the government is accurate. Withholding the letter would deny the applicant the opportunity to have in
  ARCHIVÉ - Loi sur l'acc...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Le pouvoir du commissaire à la protection de la vie privée en matière de réparation se limite à présenter les conclusions de son enquête ainsi que ses recommandations qui n'engagent en rien la GRC. Le commissaire à la protection de la vie privée n'a pas de pouvoir décisionnel, implicite ou autre, pour prendre des décisions contraignantes pour les parties à une plainte et la LPRP ne lui permet pas non plus d'accorder quelque réparation du genre.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine infosource.gc.ca as primary domain
It is trite law that the jurisdiction of a statutory body (such as the Privacy Commissioner) is limited to what the legislator decided it should be. A proper reading of the PA and especially s. 35 make it clear that Parliament wanted the Privacy Commissioner to be limited to a power of recommendation and no more. The term "recommendation" should be given its ordinary meaning-the offering of advice that is not binding.
  Sources de renseignemen...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Lorsque la propriété appartenant au gouvernement ou non est endommagée, l'accident peut être signalé à la Gendarmerie royale du Canada (voir le Fichier de renseignements personnels spécifique à l'institution Protection du personnel et des biens de la Couronne - GRC PPU 055) ou à d'autres autorités de police, ou encore à la personne ou aux personnes qui sont responsables de la propriété ou qui la contrôlent.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine infosource.gc.ca as primary domain
Information may be used to link voluntary self-identification data to information contained in other banks (refer to Standard Personal Information Bank Employment Equity and Diversity - PSE 918) for the purpose of implementing and evaluating government policies relating to employment equity and diversity. Some information may also be shared with/described in the Standard Personal Information Banks Accounts Receivable - PSU 932, Performance Management Reviews - PSE 912 and Employee Personnel Record - PSE 901. Information may also be used or disclosed for program evaluation.
  ARCHIVÉ - Loi sur l'acc...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
74 de la LPRP, une institution fédérale bénéficie de l'immunité en matière civile ou pénale pour la communication de renseignements personnels et pour les conséquences qui en découlent en autant que la communication ait été faite de bonne foi. La Cour ajoute que si le demandeur peut démontrer que la GRC a agit de mauvaise foi, il est possible que le demandeur puisse intenter des poursuites contre la GRC en vertu de la common law.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine infosource.gc.ca as primary domain
The Court noted the Privacy Commissioner's power to comment on the situation in an annual or special report to Parliament. It also noted the availability of s. 74 of the PA which only prohibits civil or criminal actions against a government institution for the wrongful disclosure of personal information where this disclosure is done in good faith. The Court added that if the applicant can show bad faith on the part of the RCMP, then it is possible that the applicant may have an action against the RCMP under the common law.
  ARCHIVÉ - Loi sur l'acc...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Le pouvoir réparateur du Commissaire à la protection de la vie privée en tant que tel est restreint à la présentation de conclusions et de recommandations non exécutoires pour la GRC. Le Commissaire à la protection de la vie privée ne détient pas l'autorité, implicite ou autre, d'un arbitre ni de prendre des décisions exécutoires à l'égard des parties que concernent une plainte, et la LPRP n'autorise pas le Commissaire à la protection de la vie privée d'accorder un tel recours.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine infosource.gc.ca as primary domain
The Privacy Commissioner's remedial powers, as such, are restricted to making findings and recommendations which are non-binding on the RCMP. The Privacy Commissioner has no authority, implicit or otherwise, to act as an adjudicator by making binding determinations on the parties to a complaint, nor does the PA allow the Privacy Commissioner to award any such remedial relief. The PA remedies are found in ss. 35 and 37 and are both restricted to the issuance of non-binding findings and recommendations.
  ARCHIVÉ - Loi sur l'acc...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
74 de la LPRP interdit les poursuites civiles ou criminelles contre une institution gouvernementale qui aurait communiqué de manière non autorisée des renseignements personnels dans les seul cas où une telle communication s'est produite de bonne foi. La Cour a ajouté que si le plaignant parvenait à démontrer que la GRC a agi de mauvaise foi, celui-ci pourrait peut-être intenter une action en common law contre la GRC.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine infosource.gc.ca as primary domain
The Court noted the Privacy Commissioner's power to comment on the situation in an annual or special report to Parliament. It also noted the availability of s. 74 of the PA which only prohibits civil or criminal actions against a government institution for the wrongful disclosure of personal information where this disclosure is done in good faith. The Court added that if the applicant can show bad faith on the part of the RCMP, then it is possible that the applicant may have an action against the RCMP under the common law.
  ARCHIVÉ - Loi sur l'acc...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
35(1) et (2) : adresser à l'institution et au plaignant un rapport présentant ses conclusions et recommandations, le cas échéant, et recevoir les avis appropriés au besoin. Dans le cas qui nous occupe, cela a été fait : tant la GRC que le demandeur ont été informés que les gestes de la GRC constituaient une enfreinte à la LPRP.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine infosource.gc.ca as primary domain
The only remedy available from the Privacy Commissioner is that outlined in subss. 35(1) and (2): providing to both the institution and the complainant the Commissioner's report outlining its findings and any recommendations, if appropriate, and receiving the appropriate notices where necessary. In the present case, this was done: both the RCMP and the applicant were advised that the RCMP's actions violated the PA. No recommendations were made, therefore the RCMP did not have to respond in kind. The Privacy Commissioner committed no error in not acting further on the applicant's complaint.
  ARCHIVÉ - Loi sur l'acc...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
35(1) et (2) : adresser à l'institution et au plaignant un rapport présentant ses conclusions et recommandations, le cas échéant, et recevoir les avis appropriés au besoin. Dans le cas qui nous occupe, cela a été fait : tant la GRC que le demandeur ont été informés que les gestes de la GRC constituaient une enfreinte à la LPRP.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine infosource.gc.ca as primary domain
The only remedy available from the Privacy Commissioner is that outlined in subss. 35(1) and (2): providing to both the institution and the complainant the Commissioner's report outlining its findings and any recommendations, if appropriate, and receiving the appropriate notices where necessary. In the present case, this was done: both the RCMP and the applicant were advised that the RCMP's actions violated the PA. No recommendations were made, therefore the RCMP did not have to respond in kind. The Privacy Commissioner committed no error in not acting further on the applicant's complaint.
  ARCHIVÉ - Loi sur l'acc...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
74 de la LPRP, une institution fédérale bénéficie de l'immunité en matière civile ou pénale pour la communication de renseignements personnels et pour les conséquences qui en découlent en autant que la communication ait été faite de bonne foi. La Cour ajoute que si le demandeur peut démontrer que la GRC a agit de mauvaise foi, il est possible que le demandeur puisse intenter des poursuites contre la GRC en vertu de la common law.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine infosource.gc.ca as primary domain
The Court noted the Privacy Commissioner's power to comment on the situation in an annual or special report to Parliament. It also noted the availability of s. 74 of the PA which only prohibits civil or criminal actions against a government institution for the wrongful disclosure of personal information where this disclosure is done in good faith. The Court added that if the applicant can show bad faith on the part of the RCMP, then it is possible that the applicant may have an action against the RCMP under the common law.
  ARCHIVÉ - Loi sur l'acc...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Cela dit, la Cour a conclu qu'étant donné les circonstances de l'espèce, la décision de la GRC de refuser de communiquer la lettre en date de septembre 1992 était déraisonnable. La Cour s'est fondée sur le fait que le demandeur avait déjà en sa possession une copie de la lettre (qu'il avait obtenue par un moyen autre qu'une demande présentée en vertu de la LPRP) et que l'on pouvait déduire, à partir des dossiers produits devant elle, que la GRC savait que le demandeur en avait une copie avant qu'elle n'en refuse la communication.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine infosource.gc.ca as primary domain
However, the Court held that, given the circumstances of this case, the RCMP's decision to refuse disclosure of the September 1992 letter was unreasonable. The Court based its finding on the fact that the applicant already had a copy of the letter (which he had obtained by means other than his request under the PA) and that it could be inferred, from the records before the Court, that the RCMP knew that the applicant had a copy prior to making its decision to refuse disclosure. The Court added that the objective to be served by not disclosing the applicant's personal information - to protect the sources and nature of sensitive information obtained or prepared in the conduct of a criminal investigation--could no longer be met because the information was already in the applicant's hands. Furthermore, the Court was of the view that, given these particular circumstances, allowing the RCMP's decision to stand would be inconsistent with the purpose of the PA which is not only to provide individuals with access to their personal information but also to protect the privacy of individuals with respect to their personal information. Implicit in this purpose is the right to ensure that one's personal information in records held by the government is accurate. Withholding the letter would deny the applicant the opportunity to have in
  ARCHIVÉ - Loi sur l'acc...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
74 de la LPRP interdit les poursuites civiles ou criminelles contre une institution gouvernementale qui aurait communiqué de manière non autorisée des renseignements personnels dans les seul cas où une telle communication s'est produite de bonne foi. La Cour a ajouté que si le plaignant parvenait à démontrer que la GRC a agi de mauvaise foi, celui-ci pourrait peut-être intenter une action en common law contre la GRC.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine infosource.gc.ca as primary domain
The Court noted the Privacy Commissioner's power to comment on the situation in an annual or special report to Parliament. It also noted the availability of s. 74 of the PA which only prohibits civil or criminal actions against a government institution for the wrongful disclosure of personal information where this disclosure is done in good faith. The Court added that if the applicant can show bad faith on the part of the RCMP, then it is possible that the applicant may have an action against the RCMP under the common law.
Arrow 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Arrow