bas – Übersetzung – Keybot-Wörterbuch

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL	Q. Vous étiez en bas pour photographier?
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain	Q. You were on the ground to take photographs?

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL	Les citoyens, y compris les Indiens, ont un droit d’accès aux chemins publics et aux bas‑côtés, mais ce droit se limite à s’y engager et à en sortir, à y circuler et à s’y déplacer, mais il ne s’étend pas à la chasse.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain	A public road in Manitoba is occupied Crown land. Citizens, including Indians, have a right of access to public roads and road allowances but such right is limited to ingress and egress, to travel thereon, and to movement thereon but does not extend to hunting thereon. Therefore it is not land to which Indians have a right of access for the purpose of hunting.

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL	Il faut considérer le par. 15(6) dans le contexte de tout l’article et en fonction de l’objet de la Loi qui est «de prévoir le placement d’un enfant en bas âge de la manière la plus expéditive et la plus équitable possible».
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain	Respondent was not entitled to the return of her child. Subsection 15(6) had to be considered in the context of the section as a whole and in light of the intention of the Act—“to provide for the placement of an infant child in as expeditious and equitable manner as possible”. The subsection did not grant an absolute right to a woman who agreed to surrender all her rights with respect to

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

Passons maintenant à l’argument subsidiaire de l’intimé, fondé sur la conclusion du juge O’Sullivan que [TRADUCTION] «pendant la saison de la chasse, les non-Indiens sont autorisés à chasser sur les bas-côtés des chemins publics lorsqu’il est possible de le faire sans danger pour le public».

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain

I turn then to respondent’s alternative submission, based upon Mr. Justice O’Sullivan’s finding that “during hunting season, non-Indians are permitted to hunt on public road allowances where the activity can be carried on without danger to the public”. On this issue, the appellant says only that the Court of Appeal was wrong in finding a general right of access to roads, for purposes of hunting. There is nothing in the record which

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

Dans les circonstances, le juge de première instance a eu raison de décider qu’il était à l’avantage des enfants et dans leur intérêt d’être confiés à la garde de leur père dans la maison où ils ont été élevés et où ils pourraient le mieux être surveillés par celui-ci et sa mère. Puisque les enfants n’étaient pas en bas âge on ne pouvait appliquer le principe de bon sens voulant que des enfants en bas âge restent avec leur mère.

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain

of custody. Under all the circumstances the trial judge rightly found that it was to the advantage and welfare of the children that they should be in the custody of their father in the home in which they had been brought up and where they could be most adequately supervised by the father and the mother. As the children were not of tender age the principle of common sense that children of tender age should be with their mother was not applicable.

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

Au contraire, la conclusion du premier juge c’est que vraisemblablement, c’est le patient lui-même qui s’est causé la fracture en se jetant en bas de son lit et la Cour d’appel n’a pas différé d’opinion à ce sujet.

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain

In the case at bar, there is no evidence that the author of the fact which caused the damage was an employee of the hospital. On the contrary, it was found by the trial judge that the patient himself probably caused the fracture by throwing himself out of his bed, and the Court of Appeal did not differ on this point. It seems clear that the accident occurred in the course of an epileptic seizure suffered by the patient, which so far as is known was happening for the first time. The doctors had not foreseen such a thing, and they are not charged with professional negligence.

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

Le juge McIntyre‑‑Ce pourvoi vise à déterminer si l'appelant, un entrepreneur qui a présenté une soumission dont la teneur était expressément irrévocable pendant un délai fixé ou jusqu'à l'acceptation d'une autre soumission, a le droit de refuser d'exécuter le contrat résultant de son acceptation à cause d'une erreur de bonne foi dans la préparation de la soumission qui a entraîné un prix plus bas que voulu.

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain

1.                       McIntyre J.‑‑This appeal raises the question of whether the appellant, a general contractor who made a tender, expressly agreed to be irrevocable for a stated period or until the acceptance of another tender, was entitled to refuse performance of the contract resulting from its acceptance because of honest error in its preparation resulting in a lower price than intended. In accordance with the tendering procedure, tenders were opened and the tender of the appellant was accepted.

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

15(6) dans le contexte de tout l’article et en fonction de l’objet de la Loi qui, comme le concède l’intimée, est [TRADUCTION] «de prévoir le placement d’un enfant en bas âge de la manière la plus expéditive et la plus équitable possible».

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain

With respect, it is my opinion that it is erroneous to interpret subs. 15(6) of the Act as granting an absolute right to a woman who has agreed to surrender all her rights with respect to her child to have an opportunity to reconsider her decision and to withdraw the surrender. Subsection 15(6) has to be considered in the context of the section as a whole and in the light of the intention of the Act which, as the respondent concedes, was “to provide for placement of an infant child in as expeditious and equitable manner as possible”.

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

Il est vrai que l’approbation du plan de lotissement pourrait augmenter le prix d’achat pour la ville, mais il y a loin de là à justifier au nom de l’intérêt public, une décision uniquement fondée sur le désir de maintenir au plus bas possible la valeur des terrains et, selon moi, de la réduire au profit des contribuables en général mais au détriment du contribuable dont les terrains sont en cause.

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain

It is true that the approving of the plan of subdivision might result in a higher cost of acquisition to the city but that is far from saying that it is a proper finding of public interest to make a decision based solely on the desire to hold down and, in my view, to reduce the value of lands to the benefit of taxpayers generally but to the detriment of the particular taxpayer whose lands were being considered.

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

Cette disposition a été conservée sans autre modification que des changements de phraséologie. Lors de l’arrêt Brown c. Lowry elle était devenue l’art. 151 du chapitre 83 des Statuts refondus du Bas-Canada. On la retrouve ensuite à l’art. 479 du Code de procédure de 1867.

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain

This provision has been preserved without any other change than of phraseology. At the time the Brown v. Lowry judgment was handed down it had become s. 151 of c. 83 of the Revised Statutes of Lower Canada. It was art. 479 in the 1867 Code of Procedure and art. 554 in the 1897 Code of Procedure. It still is, in substance, art. 480 of the present Code. Because the first judgment dealt with an inscription in review, it is to be noted that the right to inscribe in review was, at that time, given in the same terms as the right to inscribe in appeal to the Court of Queen’s Bench (27-28 Vict., c. 39, s. 20, subsequently art. 494 of the 1867 Code of Procedure).

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

La question de droit soumise en l’espèce, que je vais étudier plus bas, aurait pu être soulevée devant la Commission et nous parvenir par les voies d’appel habituelles, en passant par la Cour d’appel fédérale.

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain

I can say at once that this Court will not interfere with the grant of the interlocutory injunction. It is rare for it to interfere in proceedings which are not dispositive of the matters in issue and hence, in this case it is the declinatory exception which is the only matter that needs consideration. The broad regulatory powers of the Canadian Transport Commission over Bell and over its operations are conceded. The issue of law presented here, to which I will come shortly, is one that might have been raised in proceedings before the Commission and it might have come here in the ordinary course of appellate proceedings after

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

La question primordiale est la suivante: a-t-on prouvé que la personne que l’on veut tenir responsable est l’auteur du fait dommageable? Dans la présente cause c’est vraisemblablement le patient lui-même qui s’est causé la fracture en se jetant en bas de son lit.

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain

The fundamental question is as follows: Has it been shown that the person whose responsibility is in issue was the author of the fact that caused the damage? In the case at bar the patient himself probably caused the fracture by throwing himself out of his bed. The accident probably occurred in the course of an unexpected epileptic seizure suffered by the patient which, so far as is known, was happening for the first time. There is no basis, therefore, for a finding of fault attributable to an employee of the hospital. The facts proven do not call for the application of the presumption of fault applied in Martel v. Hôtel-Dieu St. Vallier, [1969] S.C.R. 745.

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

La plate-forme sans garde-fou, la paille ou le foin épars sur la plate-forme et sur la pile de bottes au-dessous de la fenêtre, le fait que l’extérieur de la pile de bottes descendait en pente jusqu’au plancher de béton, 15 pieds plus bas, tout cela montre que l’endroit pouvait être dangereux et que MacIvor aurait dû s’en apercevoir lorsqu’il y a posté l’appelant pour que celui-ci attrape et lance les lourdes bottes qui tombaient du convoyeur.

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain

It is unfortunate that exhibit 3 (2nd Series) shown at p. 130 of the Appeal Case cannot be reproduced here. It portrays the scene in a manner that leaves me in no doubt at all as to the position of peril in which the appellant was required to work. The unguarded platform, the loose hay or straw on the platform and on the pile of bales beneath the window, the fact that the bales sloped outwards towards the void 15 feet above the concrete floor all depict a scene of potential danger that must have been obvious to MacIvor when he placed appellant there to catch and deflect the heavy bales as they fell from the conveyor. The whole situation amounts to a condition far below the standard of care required of the penitentiary authorities in the circumstances.

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

Pour la première fois il a commencé à faire des épisodes épileptiques et essayé de s’échapper de son lit ce qui motiva l’ordre du médecin d’installer des côtés de lit. Comme il se plaignait de douleurs à la cuisse, une radiographie fut prise et révéla une fracture de la hanche droite résultant probablement d’une chute en bas du lit.

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain

Respondent, after being hospitalized initially in appellant institution suffering from rupture of a cerebral aneurism in the right hemisphere, was re-admitted for observation and examination because his condition had worsened. He then for the first time began to have epileptic seizures and attempted to leave his bed, which prompted his doctor to order that sides be installed. Because he complained of pain in his thigh, an X-ray was taken and it indicated a fracture of the right hip resulting probably from a fall from his bed. The judgment of the Superior Court dismissing respondent’s action was reversed by the Court of Appeal, with a dissent. Hence the appeal to this Court.

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

On a décrit le temps de diverses manières; on a dit qu’il était «très brumeux», qu’il y avait des «nappes de brume» et qu’il était plus bouché dans les endroits bas comme dans le secteur de l’intersection en cause.

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain

At or about 7:30 a.m. on April 21, 1965, the deceased was driving his automobile south on Highway 48. At approximately the same time the respondent was driving his tractor-trailer east on Bloomington, intending to cross the highway and proceed eastward. The weather that morning was cloudy with poor visibility due to fog and variously described as “very foggy” or “patchy” and thicker in low areas such as in the area of the intersection in question. A police constable who arrived on the scene very soon after the impact testified that visibility at that time in that area was limited to about 200 feet. The pavement was wet in the vicinity of the intersection.

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

Le plus jeune est donc âgé de presque onze ans aujourd’hui. Ce ne sont pas des enfants en bas âge et on ne peut tout simplement pas appliquer ici le principe de bon sens souvent énoncé voulant que des enfants en bas âge restent avec leur mère.

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain

The learned trial judge was also appreciative of the fact that the infant children in this case were all boys born, respectively, in November 1960, January 1963 and November 1964. The youngest, therefore, is now almost eleven years old. They are not children of tender age and the principle of common sense often expressed that such children of tender age should be with their mother is simply not applicable. The learned trial judge in his reasons noted that the wishes of the children had been consulted and that these boys had expressed a preference to stay with their mother. The learned trial judge astutely observed that, in fact, the children had been with their mother for about a year previous to the trial. It would be only natural that a parent who had custody of his or her children for that period of time would see to it that those children expressed a preference to have such a situation continue. The learned trial judge found

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

Le plus jeune est donc âgé de presque onze ans aujourd’hui. Ce ne sont pas des enfants en bas âge et on ne peut tout simplement pas appliquer ici le principe de bon sens souvent énoncé voulant que des enfants en bas âge restent avec leur mère.

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain

The learned trial judge was also appreciative of the fact that the infant children in this case were all boys born, respectively, in November 1960, January 1963 and November 1964. The youngest, therefore, is now almost eleven years old. They are not children of tender age and the principle of common sense often expressed that such children of tender age should be with their mother is simply not applicable. The learned trial judge in his reasons noted that the wishes of the children had been consulted and that these boys had expressed a preference to stay with their mother. The learned trial judge astutely observed that, in fact, the children had been with their mother for about a year previous to the trial. It would be only natural that a parent who had custody of his or her children for that period of time would see to it that those children expressed a preference to have such a situation continue. The learned trial judge found

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

Est-il si excessivement bas qu’il ne peut être retenu ou le juge de première instance a-t-il oublié de tenir compte de certains éléments pertinents en fixant l’indemnité (voir Proctor c. Dyck[2], p. 251)?

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain

The amount awarded is substantial but it is urged was not sufficient in the circumstances. Is it so inordinately low that it cannot stand or did the trial judge overlook some revelant elements in making his award (see Proctor v. Dyck[2], at p. 251)? It is true that since 1949 appellant has spent some 7 years in prison and he had another year to serve when he was injured. The care which this man requires will cost a substantial amount each week. There was no evidence adduced on the point but the Court can take notice of the fact that such care as this man requires and will require for the rest of his life costs considerable. Notwithstanding that he has been sentenced to prison on several occasions, he did work from time to time and he will sustain some loss

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL

Dans les circonstances, le juge de première instance a eu raison de décider qu’il était à l’avantage des enfants et dans leur intérêt d’être confiés à la garde de leur père dans la maison où ils ont été élevés et où ils pourraient le mieux être surveillés par celui-ci et sa mère. Puisque les enfants n’étaient pas en bas âge on ne pouvait appliquer le principe de bon sens voulant que des enfants en bas âge restent avec leur mère.

Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain

of custody. Under all the circumstances the trial judge rightly found that it was to the advantage and welfare of the children that they should be in the custody of their father in the home in which they had been brought up and where they could be most adequately supervised by the father and the mother. As the children were not of tender age the principle of common sense that children of tender age should be with their mother was not applicable.

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL	[TRADUCTION] La chasse a eu lieu sur le bas-côté d’un chemin public qui est une terre occupée de la Couronne. Les juges d’instance inférieure ont jugé que tant les Indians que les autres ont un droit d’accès aux chemins publics et aux bas-côtés, mais que ce droit est limité et ne s’étend pas à la chasse.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain	The hunting took place on a public road allowance which is occupied Crown land. The learned judges below held that Indians in common with others have a right of access to public roads and road allowances but that such right is limited and does not extend to hunting.

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL	D. T. a témoigné que les actes en cause se sont produits au pupitre de l'instituteur quand l'élève y allait pour obtenir de l'aide dans ses travaux. Il a affirmé que l'intimé lui a touché au pénis du revers de la main en frottant de haut en bas.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain	D. T. testified that the acts in question occurred at the teacher's desk when he went up to get help with his work.  He testified that the respondent had rubbed the back of his hand up and down on his (D. T.'s) penis.  He said that the rubbing had occurred on more than one occasion.

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL	Au Québec, la législation sur cette question paraît avoir été décrétée en premier lieu par l’art. 90 de l’Acte pour amender les actes de judicature du Bas-Canada, 20 Vict. (1857), ch. 44:
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain	Legislation on this matter in Quebec seems to have been first enacted by the Act to amend the Judicature Acts of Lower Canada, (1857) 20 Vict., c. 44:

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL	Excepté les personnes qui peuvent légalement pratiquer la médecine dans le Bas Canada, nul ne pourra, sous aucuns prétextes, vendre ou distribuer des médecines en détail…
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain	Except such persons as may lawfully practise physic in Lower Canada, no person whatsoever shall, on any pretence, sell or distribute medicines by retail…

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL	Code civil du Bas Canada, art. 19.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain	Civil Code of Lower Canada, art. 19.

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL	Code civil du Bas‑Canada, art. 1110, 1053, 2224, 2231, 2262(2).
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain	Civil Code of Lower Canada, arts. 1110, 1053, 2224, 2231, 2262(2).

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL	27. L’étranger, quoique non résidant dans le Bas Canada, peut y être poursuivi pour l’exécution des obligations qu’il a contractées même en pays étranger.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain	27. Aliens, although not resident in Lower Canada, may be sued in its courts for the fulfilment of obligations contracted by them in foreign countries.

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL	20 Code civil du Bas Canada
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain	20 Civil Code of Lower Canada

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL	Plus bas à la même page:
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain	and later on the same page:

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL	Code civil du Bas Canada, art. 1078.1.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain	Automobile Insurance Act, R.S.Q., c. A-25, s. 1(7)(b) “spouses”.

  Cour suprême du Canada ...  

Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL	3.  Il est admis que la loi applicable au Québec à l'époque de la Confédération est le chapitre 15 des Statuts Refondus du Bas Canada de 1861 . . .
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine scc.lexum.org as primary domain	3. It was common ground that the relevant law in force in Quebec at Confederation was Chapter 15 of the Consolidated Statutes of Lower Canada of 1861 . . . .