impr – -Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot 9 Results  csc.lexum.org
  document  
743.6.€€Lð ðordonnance€ tait€justifi e€au€regard€duÐ Ô P Ðdossier€et€elle€a€ t €rendue€au€terme€dð ðune€audience€o €les€principes€de€lð ð quit Ð l è Ðproc durale€ont€ t €respect s.Ý ƒ % Ñýb } ݌Р"€ ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú39Ú ÚÛ € z ' Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àJe€reconnais€que€la€partie€des€motifs€du€juge€du€proc s€portant€express mentÐ 4%° $ Ðsur€la€question€de€lð ðaugmentation€du€temps€dð ð preuve€est€quelque€peu€impr cise.€€IlÐ Ì&H & Ðaurait€dðE ð€sð ðefforcer€de€faire€une€analyse€plus€d taill e.€€Toutefois,€les€motifs€doivent€ treÐ d(à ( Ðconsid r s€globalement€et€lus€en€corr lation€avec€les€observations€et€la€preuve€pr sent esÐ ü)x!* Ð €lð ðaudience.€€Bien€quð ðils€ne€soient€pas€d taill s,€les€motifs€permettent€ €une€cour€dð ðappelÐ ”+ #, Ðde€d gager€les€assises€de€lð ðordonnance€du€juge€du€proc s€et€dð ðen€contrð= ðler€le€bien-fond .Ð ,-¨$. ÐEn€cons quence,€les€motifs€ne€contreviennent€pas€ €la€norme€ tablie€dans€lð ðarr tò òÐ Ä.@&0 ÐSheppardó ó.€€Le€jugeGodin€a€examin €attentivement€tous€les€faits€pertinents,Ð \0Ø'2 Ðparticuli rement€le€caract re€gratuit€du€crime€et€la€n cessit €de€prot ger€le€public.Ð „ ÐCeux-ci€confirment€sa€conclusion€selon€laquelle€il€ tait€impossible€de€satisfaire€auxÐ ˜ Ðobjectifs€de€dissuasion€et€de€r probation€sans€retarder€lð ðadmissibilit € €la€lib rationÐ ´ 0 Ðconditionnelle.Ý ƒ % Ñý 2 ݌РL È ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñý©!
ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñýïó Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú40Ú ÚÛ € z ( Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àProcedural€fairness€was€observed.€€In€its€submissions,€the€Crown€asked€forÐ l è Ðdelayed€parole.€€The€accused,€through€his€counsel,€could€have€made€his€own€submissionsÐ "€ Ðor€presented€evidence€to€oppose€the€Crownð ðs€request.€€He€could€have€requested€anÐ œ# " Ðadjournment,€if€the€Crownð ðs€move€took€him€by€surprise.€€None€of€this€was€attempted.€Ð 4%° $ ÐIt€was€never€suggested€that€this€was€a€case€of€inadequate€representation.€€The€accusedÐ Ì&H & Ðwas€given€a€sufficient€opportunity€to€respond€to€the€Crownð ðs€request.€€He€failed€to€useÐ d(à ( Ðit.€€He€cannot€fault€the€judge€for€this.Ý ƒ % Ñýïó ô ݌Рü)x!* ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýY÷ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú41Ú ÚÛ € z ) Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àThe€Court€of€Appeal€took€the€appropriate€approach€to€the€review€of€aÐ ,-¨$. Ðsentencing€decision.€€In€the€absence€of€an€error€of€principle,€a€breach€of€the€principles€ofÐ Ä.@&0 Ðprocedural€fairness€or€a€clearly€erroneous€and€material€finding€of€fact,€it€decided€that€itÐ \0Ø'2 Ðshould€not€intervene.€€Its€decision€was€well€founded.€€It€can€be€upheld€under€both€theÐ „ Ðnarrow€and€the€broad€interpretations€of€s.€743.6,€which€can€be€reconciled,€as€€indicatedÐ ˜ Ðabove.Ý ƒ % ÑýY÷ t÷ ݌Р´ 0 ÐŒÝ ÝÌIX.€€ò òDispositionó óÐ ä ` ÐÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % Ñýgú Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú42Ú ÚÛ € z * Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àFor€these€reasons,€I€would€dismiss€the€appeal.Ý ƒ % Ñýgú ‚ú ݌Р ÐŒÝ ÝÌà œ àò òAppeal€dismissed.€€Ð D À ÐÌà œ àSolicitor€for€the€appellant:Eric€J.€Doiron,€Moncton.Ð t ð ÐÌà œ àSolicitor€for€the€respondent:Attorney€General€of€New€Brunswick,€Moncton.Ð ¤ ÐÌà0 œ àSolicitor€for€the€intervener:Attorney€General€of€Ontario,€Toronto.ó óÐ Ô P œ Ð œ Ð Ð
  document  
Ðconsid ration€quatre€facteurs€particuliers,€ne€sont€pas€inconstitutionnellement€impr cis. €Ð h Ô ÐLð ðexamen€est€limit € €la€perception€collective€raisonnable€de€la€n cessit €de€refuser€laÐ l Ðmise€en€libert €sous€caution€pour€maintenir€la€confiance€du€public€dans€lð ðadministrationÐ ˜ Ðde€la€justice,€que€les€tribunaux€d finissent€ €travers€le€prisme€objectif€de€ð ð€toutes€lesÐ 0 œ Ðcirconstances,€notamment€le€fait€que€lð ðaccusation€parað3 ðt€fond e,€la€gravit €deÐ È 4 Ðlð ðinfraction,€les€circonstances€entourant€sa€perp tration€et€le€fait€que€le€pr venu€encourt,Ð `"Ì Ðen€cas€de€condamnation,€une€longue€peine€dð ðemprisonnementð ð.€€Ces€facteurs€peuventÐ ø#d " Ðcontribuer€ €sauvegarder€une€norme€m me€dans€le€cas€o €elle€sð ðav re€dð ðune€impr cisionÐ %ü $ Ðinacceptable€lorsquð ðelle€est€consid r e€isol ment:€ò òNova€Scotia€Pharmaceutical€Societyó ó,Ð ('” & Ðpr cit .
Ð47;€ò òR.€v.€Moralesó ó,€[1992]€3€S.C.R.€711;€ò òR.€v.€Pearsonó ó,€[1992]€3€S.C.R.€665;€ò òR.€v.Ð ¦ Ô ÐRondeauó ó€(1996),€108€C.C.C.€(3d)€474,€[1996]€R.J.Q.€1155;€ò òR.€v.€MacDougaló ó€(1999),Ð > l Ð138€C.C.C.€(3d)€38;€ò òCanadian€Broadcasting€Corp.€v.€New€Brunswick€(AttorneyÐ Ö ÐGeneral)ó ó,€[1996]€3€S.C.R.€480;€ò òRe€Powers€and€The€Queenó ó€(1972),€9€C.C.C.€(2d)€533;Ð n œ Ðò òR.€v.€Dakinó ó,€[1989]€O.J.€No.€1348€(QL);€ò òR.€v.€Nguyenó ó€(1997),€119€C.C.C.€(3d)€269;€ò òR.Ð 4 Ðv.€Oakesó ó,€[1986]€1€S.C.R.€103;€ò òS€v.€Dlaminió ó,€1999€(4)€SA€623;€ò òR.€v.€Rezaieó ó€(1996),€112Ð ž Ì ÐC.C.C.€(3d)€97;€ò òSchachter€v.€Canadaó ó,€[1992]€2€S.C.R.€679;€ò òVriend€v.€Albertaó ó,€[1998]Ð 6"d " Ð1€S.C.R.€493;€ò òR.€v.€Oð ðConnoró ó,€[1995]€4€S.C.R.€411;€ò òR.€v.€Millsó ó,€[1999]€3€S.C.R.€668.Ð Î#ü $ ÐÌò òó óò òStatutes€and€Regulations€Citedó óÐ ¤'Ò!( ÐÓ ? Ü , ‚X ” œ ø Ü 8 ô Ü , „ œ ø Ü 8 ¼ ? ÓÌò òÓ Óà0 ” àà Ü àAct€respecting€the€duties€of€Justices€of€the€Peace,€out€of€Sessions,€in€relation€toÐ z+¨%, Ðpersons€charged€with€Indictable€Offencesó ó,€S.C.€1869,€c.€30.Ð F,t&- ” Ð ” Ð ÐÌò òà0 ” àà Ü àBail€Reform€Actó ó,€S.C.€1970„71„72,€c.€37,€s.5.Ð „.²(/ ” Ð ” Ð ÐÐ £/Ñ)0 Ðò òà0 ” àà Ü àCanadian€Charter€of€Rights€and€Freedomsó ó,€ss.1,€11(ò òeó ó).Ð Ò ” Ð ” Ð ÐÌò òà0 ” àà Ü àConstitution€Act,€1982ó ó,€s.52.Ð > ” Ð ” Ð ÐÌò òà0 ” àà Ü àCriminal€Codeó ó,€R.S.C.€1970,€c.€C„34,€s.457(7)(ò òaó ó),€(ò òbó ó).Ð N | ” Ð ” Ð ÐÌò òà0 ” àà Ü àCriminal€Codeó ó,€R.S.C.€1985,€c.€C„46,€ss.486(1),€515(10)€[am.€1997,€c.€18,€s.59],€522.Ð Œ º ” Ð ” Ð ÐÌò òà0 ” àà Ü àCriminal€Codeó ó,€S.C.€1953„54,€c.€51,€s.463(1)€[am.€1960„61,€c.€43,€s.16],€(3).Ð Ê ø ” Ð ” Ð ÐÌò òà0 ” àà Ü àCriminal€Law€Improvement€Act,€1996ó ó,€S.C.€1997,€c.€18,€s.59.Ð 6 ” Ð ” Ð ÐÓ ÓÌÓ ëT Óò òAuthors€Citedó óÐ @ ÐÓ ÓÌÓ Óà0 ” àà Ü àCanada.€Canadian€Committee€on€Corrections.€€ò òToward€Unity:€Criminal€Justice€andÐ J ÐCorrectionsó ó.€€Ottawa:€€Queenð ðs€Printer,€1969.Ð è ” Ð ” Ð ÐÌà0 ” àà Ü àCanada.€€National€Council€of€Welfare.€€ò òJustice€and€the€Poor:€€A€National€Council€ofÐ & T ÐWelfare€Publicationó ó.€€Ottawa:€€The€Council,€2000.Ð ò ” Ð ” Ð ÐÌà0 ” àà Ü àCanada.€€Senate.€€Standing€Senate€Committee€on€Legal€and€Constitutional€Affairs.€Ð 0 ^ Ðò òProceedings€of€the€Standing€Senate€Committee€on€Legal€and€ConstitutionalÐ ü * ÐAffairsó ó,€€Issue€No.€60,€2nd€Sess.,€35th€Parl.,€April21,1997,€p.60:30.Ð È ö ” Ð ” Ð ÐÌà0 ” àà Ü àFriedland,€Martin€L.€€ò òDetention€before€Trial:€€A€Study€of€Criminal€Cases€Tried€in€theÐ !4 Ð
  document  
30,€nous€avonsÐ d Ðsoulign €que€les€cas€dans€lesquels€la€Cour€a€refus €de€r pondre€ €une€question€pos eÐ ü ˜ Ðdans€un€renvoi€pour€un€autre€motif€que€le€fait€quð ðelle€ne€pr sente€pas€un€aspectÐ ” 0 Ðsuffisamment€juridique€peuvent€ tre€class s€en€deux€grandes€cat gories:€(1)€laÐ , È Ðquestion€est€trop€impr cise€ou€ambigu €pour€quð ðil€soit€possible€dð ðy€apporter€uneÐ Ä ` Ðr ponse€exacte:€voir,€par€exemple,€ò òRenvoi€relatif€ €la€taxe€sur€les€produits€et€servicesó ó,Ð \ ø Ð[1992]€2€R.C.S.€445,€p.
Ðthe€Court€has€refused€to€answer€reference€questions€on€grounds€other€than€lack€of€legalÐ Ô/p)4 Ðcontent€tend€to€fall€into€two€broad€categories:€€(1)€where€the€question€is€too€ambiguousÐ d Ðor€imprecise€to€allow€an€accurate€answer:€€see,€e.g.,€ò òReference€re€Goods€and€ServicesÐ ü ˜ ÐTaxó ó,€[1992]€2€S.C.R.€445,€at€p.€485;€and€ò òReference€re€Remuneration€of€Judges€of€theÐ ” 0 ÐProvincial€Court€of€Prince€Edward€Islandó ó,€[1997]€3€S.C.R.€3,€at€para.€256;€and€(2)€whereÐ , È Ðthe€parties€have€not€provided€the€Court€with€sufficient€information€to€provide€a€completeÐ Ä ` Ðanswer:€see,€Ô_ Ôe.g.,Ô_ Ô€ò òReference€re€Authority€of€Parliament€in€relation€to€the€Upper€Houseó ó,Ð \ ø Ð[1980]€1€S.C.R.€54,€at€pp.€75Ô_ Ô„77;€and€ò òReferenceÔ_ Ô€re€Remuneration€of€Judges€of€theÐ ô  ÐProvincial€Court€of€Prince€Edward€Islandó ó,€at€para.€257.€€These€categories€highlight€twoÐ Œ ( Ðimportant€considerations,€but€are€not€exhaustive.Ý ƒ 0 ÑýÆG áG ݌Р$ À ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 ÑýJM Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú64Ú ÚÛ € z @ Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àA€unique€set€of€circumstances€is€raised€by€Question€4,€the€combined€effectÐ T ð Ðof€which€persuades€the€Court€that€it€would€be€unwise€and€inappropriate€to€answer€theÐ ì ˆ Ðquestion.Ý ƒ 0 ÑýJM eM ݌Р„ ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ 0 Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ 0 ÑýåN Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú65Ú ÚÛ € z A Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àThe€first€consideration€on€the€issue€of€whether€this€Court€should€answer€theÐ ´ P Ðfourth€question€is€the€governmentð ðs€stated€position€that€it€will€proceed€by€way€ofÐ L è Ðlegislative€enactment,€regardless€of€what€answer€we€give€to€this€question.€€In€oralÐ ä € Ðargument,€counsel€reiterated€the€governmentð ðs€unequivocal€intention€to€introduceÐ |! " Ðlegislation€in€relation€to€same„sex€marriage,€regardless€of€the€answer€to€Question€4.€€TheÐ #° $ Ðgovernment€has€clearly€accepted€the€rulings€of€lower€courts€on€this€question€and€hasÐ ¬$H & Ðadopted€their€position€as€its€own.€€The€common€law€definition€of€marriage€in€fiveÐ D&à ( Ðprovinces€and€one€territory€no€longer€imports€an€opposite„sex€requirement.€€In€addition,Ð Ü'x!* Ðs.€ò òó ó5€of€theò ò€Federal€Lawð! ðCivil€Law€Harmonization€Act,€No.€1ó ó,€S.C.€2001,€c.€4,€no€longerÐ t) #, Ðimports€an€opposite„sex€requirement.€€Given€the€governmentð ðs€stated€commitment€to€thisÐ +¨$. Ðcourse€of€action,€an€opinion€on€the€constitutionality€of€an€opposite„sex€requirement€forÐ ¤,@&0 Ðmarriage€serves€no€legal€purpose.€€On€the€other€hand,€answering€this€question€may€haveÐ
  document  
ÐÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýÑ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú75Ú ÚÛ € z K Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà µ àApr s€avoir€statu €que€le€motif€de€lð ðð ðint r t€publicð ð€ tait€dð ðuneÐ B ® Ðimpr cision€inacceptable€et€que,€pour€cette€raison,€il€violait€lð ðal.
݌РK y ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ Óà0 « àIn€my€view€the€principles€of€fundamental€justice€preclude€a€standardlessÐ !$O $ Ðsweep€in€any€provision€which€authorizes€imprisonment.€€This€is€all€theÐ í$ % Ðmore€so€under€a€constitutional€guarantee€not€to€be€denied€bail€without€justÐ ¹%ç & Ðcause€as€set€out€in€s.€11(ò òeó ó).€€ò òSince€pre„trial€detention€is€extraordinary€inÐ …&³ ' Ðour€system€of€criminal€justice,€vagueness€in€defining€the€terms€of€pre„trialÐ Q'!( Ðdetention€may€be€even€more€invidious€than€is€vagueness€in€defining€anÐ (K") Ðoffence.ó ó€[Emphasis€added.]Ð é( #* « Ð « Ð ÐÓ ÓÌÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýSÛ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú73Ú ÚÛ € z I Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àLamer€C.J.€held€further,€at€p.€729,€that€the€fact€that€a€vague€provisionÐ Þ- (/ Ðauthorizes€judicial€discretion€as€opposed€to€arbitrary€law€enforcement€was€irrelevant:Ý ƒ % ÑýSÛ nÛ ÝŒÐ v/¤)1 ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ Óà0 « àA€standardless€sweep€does€not€become€acceptable€simply€because€it€resultsÐ ½ ë Ðfrom€the€whims€of€judges€and€justices€of€the€peace€rather€than€the€whimsÐ ‰ · Ðof€law€enforcement€officials.€€Cloaking€whims€in€judicial€robes€is€notÐ U ƒ Ðsufficient€to€satisfy€the€principles€of€fundamental€justice.€Ó ÓÐ ! O « Ð « Ð ÐÌÝ ‚ % Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ % ÑýsÞ Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú74Ú ÚÛ € z J Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà « àIn€order€to€satisfy€the€vagueness€test,€the€provision€in€question€had€to€beÐ ÷ % Ðð ðcapable€of€being€given€a€constant€and€settled€meaning€by€the€courtsð ð€(p.€730).€€LamerÐ  ½ ÐC.J.€canvassed€cases€which€had€denied€bail€under€the€ð ðpublic€interestð ð€ground,€and,€atÐ ' U Ðpp.€731„32,€concluded€that€this€term€did€not€delineate€a€sufficiently€precise€standard:Ý ƒ % ÑýsÞ ŽÞ ݌Р¿ í ÐŒÝ ÝÌÓ Óà0 « àà ø àIn€my€view,€these€authorities€do€not€establish€any€ð ðworkable€meaningð ðÐ • à Ðfor€the€term€ð ðpublic€interestð ð.€€On€the€contrary,€these€authoritiesÐ a  Ðdemonstrate€the€open„ended€nature€of€the€term....€In€my€view,€theseÐ - [ Ðauthorities€demonstrate€that€the€term€ð ðpublic€interestð ð€has€not€been€givenÐ ù ' Ða€constant€or€settled€meaning€by€the€courts.€€The€term€provides€noÐ Å ó Ðguidance€for€legal€debate.€€The€term€authorizes€a€standardless€sweep,€asÐ ‘ ¿ Ðthe€court€can€order€imprisonment€whenever€it€sees€fit.€€According€to€ò òNovaÐ ] ‹ ÐScotia€Pharmaceutical€Societyó ó,€ò òsupraó ó,€at€p.€642,€such€unfettered€discretionÐ ) W Ðviolates€the€doctrine€of€vagueness:Ð õ # « Ð « Ð ÐÌà0 « àà0 ø « Ð « Ð àà Ü àWhat€becomes€more€problematic€is€not€so€much€general€termsÐ 3 a Ðconferring€broad€discretion,€but€terms€failing€to€give€direction€as€toÐ ÿ - Ðhow€t
  document  
Ðconsid ration€quatre€facteurs€particuliers,€ne€sont€pas€inconstitutionnellement€impr cis. €Ð h Ô ÐLð ðexamen€est€limit € €la€perception€collective€raisonnable€de€la€n cessit €de€refuser€laÐ l Ðmise€en€libert €sous€caution€pour€maintenir€la€confiance€du€public€dans€lð ðadministrationÐ ˜ Ðde€la€justice,€que€les€tribunaux€d finissent€ €travers€le€prisme€objectif€de€ð ð€toutes€lesÐ 0 œ Ðcirconstances,€notamment€le€fait€que€lð ðaccusation€parað3 ðt€fond e,€la€gravit €deÐ È 4 Ðlð ðinfraction,€les€circonstances€entourant€sa€perp tration€et€le€fait€que€le€pr venu€encourt,Ð `"Ì Ðen€cas€de€condamnation,€une€longue€peine€dð ðemprisonnementð ð.€€Ces€facteurs€peuventÐ ø#d " Ðcontribuer€ €sauvegarder€une€norme€m me€dans€le€cas€o €elle€sð ðav re€dð ðune€impr cisionÐ %ü $ Ðinacceptable€lorsquð ðelle€est€consid r e€isol ment:€ò òNova€Scotia€Pharmaceutical€Societyó ó,Ð ('” & Ðpr cit .
Ð47;€ò òR.€v.€Moralesó ó,€[1992]€3€S.C.R.€711;€ò òR.€v.€Pearsonó ó,€[1992]€3€S.C.R.€665;€ò òR.€v.Ð ¦ Ô ÐRondeauó ó€(1996),€108€C.C.C.€(3d)€474,€[1996]€R.J.Q.€1155;€ò òR.€v.€MacDougaló ó€(1999),Ð > l Ð138€C.C.C.€(3d)€38;€ò òCanadian€Broadcasting€Corp.€v.€New€Brunswick€(AttorneyÐ Ö ÐGeneral)ó ó,€[1996]€3€S.C.R.€480;€ò òRe€Powers€and€The€Queenó ó€(1972),€9€C.C.C.€(2d)€533;Ð n œ Ðò òR.€v.€Dakinó ó,€[1989]€O.J.€No.€1348€(QL);€ò òR.€v.€Nguyenó ó€(1997),€119€C.C.C.€(3d)€269;€ò òR.Ð 4 Ðv.€Oakesó ó,€[1986]€1€S.C.R.€103;€ò òS€v.€Dlaminió ó,€1999€(4)€SA€623;€ò òR.€v.€Rezaieó ó€(1996),€112Ð ž Ì ÐC.C.C.€(3d)€97;€ò òSchachter€v.€Canadaó ó,€[1992]€2€S.C.R.€679;€ò òVriend€v.€Albertaó ó,€[1998]Ð 6"d " Ð1€S.C.R.€493;€ò òR.€v.€Oð ðConnoró ó,€[1995]€4€S.C.R.€411;€ò òR.€v.€Millsó ó,€[1999]€3€S.C.R.€668.Ð Î#ü $ ÐÌò òó óò òStatutes€and€Regulations€Citedó óÐ ¤'Ò!( ÐÓ ? Ü , ‚X ” œ ø Ü 8 ô Ü , „ œ ø Ü 8 ¼ ? ÓÌò òÓ Óà0 ” àà Ü àAct€respecting€the€duties€of€Justices€of€the€Peace,€out€of€Sessions,€in€relation€toÐ z+¨%, Ðpersons€charged€with€Indictable€Offencesó ó,€S.C.€1869,€c.€30.Ð F,t&- ” Ð ” Ð ÐÌò òà0 ” àà Ü àBail€Reform€Actó ó,€S.C.€1970„71„72,€c.€37,€s.5.Ð „.²(/ ” Ð ” Ð ÐÐ £/Ñ)0 Ðò òà0 ” àà Ü àCanadian€Charter€of€Rights€and€Freedomsó ó,€ss.1,€11(ò òeó ó).Ð Ò ” Ð ” Ð ÐÌò òà0 ” àà Ü àConstitution€Act,€1982ó ó,€s.52.Ð > ” Ð ” Ð ÐÌò òà0 ” àà Ü àCriminal€Codeó ó,€R.S.C.€1970,€c.€C„34,€s.457(7)(ò òaó ó),€(ò òbó ó).Ð N | ” Ð ” Ð ÐÌò òà0 ” àà Ü àCriminal€Codeó ó,€R.S.C.€1985,€c.€C„46,€ss.486(1),€515(10)€[am.€1997,€c.€18,€s.59],€522.Ð Œ º ” Ð ” Ð ÐÌò òà0 ” àà Ü àCriminal€Codeó ó,€S.C.€1953„54,€c.€51,€s.463(1)€[am.€1960„61,€c.€43,€s.16],€(3).Ð Ê ø ” Ð ” Ð ÐÌò òà0 ” àà Ü àCriminal€Law€Improvement€Act,€1996ó ó,€S.C.€1997,€c.€18,€s.59.Ð 6 ” Ð ” Ð ÐÓ ÓÌÓ ëT Óò òAuthors€Citedó óÐ @ ÐÓ ÓÌÓ Óà0 ” àà Ü àCanada.€Canadian€Committee€on€Corrections.€€ò òToward€Unity:€Criminal€Justice€andÐ J ÐCorrectionsó ó.€€Ottawa:€€Queenð ðs€Printer,€1969.Ð è ” Ð ” Ð ÐÌà0 ” àà Ü àCanada.€€National€Council€of€Welfare.€€ò òJustice€and€the€Poor:€€A€National€Council€ofÐ & T ÐWelfare€Publicationó ó.€€Ottawa:€€The€Council,€2000.Ð ò ” Ð ” Ð ÐÌà0 ” àà Ü àCanada.€€Senate.€€Standing€Senate€Committee€on€Legal€and€Constitutional€Affairs.€Ð 0 ^ Ðò òProceedings€of€the€Standing€Senate€Committee€on€Legal€and€ConstitutionalÐ ü * ÐAffairsó ó,€€Issue€No.€60,€2nd€Sess.,€35th€Parl.,€April21,1997,€p.60:30.Ð È ö ” Ð ” Ð ÐÌà0 ” àà Ü àFriedland,€Martin€L.€€ò òDetention€before€Trial:€€A€Study€of€Criminal€Cases€Tried€in€theÐ !4 Ð
  document  
€€Ainsi,€en€cas€de€changementsÐ „ Ðdans€la€conjoncture€du€march €ou€de€modifications€impr visibles€de€la€statistiqueÐ ¸ Ðactuarielle,€la€valeur€actuelle€de€lð ðactif€de€la€caisse€peut€en€fait€ tre€inf rieure€ouÐ ´ P Ðsup rieure€ €lð ð valuation€initiale.Ý ƒ T Ñý§¹ ¹ ݌РL è ÐŒÝ ÝÌÝ ‚ T Ñýÿ ÝÝ ÝÝ ‚ T Ñý# Ýà „ àÚ ƒ z Ú22Ú ÚÛ € z Ûà Ü àÝ Ýà œ àSi,€pour€une€ann e€donn e,€lð ðactif€de€la€caisse,€selon€une€ valuation€ €longÐ |!
ÐÓ R " Ü , ‚X œ ø Ü 8 Ò " Ü , ‚X œ ø Ü / Ò " ç^ R ÓÌà œ àà0 ø à(Ô_ ÔiÔ_ Ô)à0 8 ø Ð ø Ð àany€other€prescribed€event€or€prescribed€circumstance€occurs.Ð „ ô 8 Ð 8 Ð ÐÌà0 œ àà Ü àà œ àà ø à(2)€In€an€order€under€subsection€(1),€the€Superintendent€shall€specifyÐ Œ Ðthe€effective€date€of€the€wind€up,€the€persons€or€class€or€classes€of€personsÐ è X Ðto€whom€the€administrator€shall€give€notice€of€the€order€and€theÐ ´ $ Ðinformation€that€shall€be€given€in€the€notice.€Ð € ð œ Ð œ Ð ÐÌà0 œ àà Ü àà œ àò òà ø à70.ó ó€Ô_ Ô(1)Ô_ Ô€Ô_ ÔÔ_ Ô€The€administrator€of€a€pension€plan€that€is€to€be€wound€up€inÐ ˆ Ðwhole€or€in€part€shall€file€a€wind€up€report€that€sets€out,Ð ä T œ Ð œ Ð ÐÌà0 œ àà0 ø œ Ð œ Ð à(a)à0 8 ø Ð ø Ð àthe€assets€and€liabilities€of€the€pension€plan;Ð | ì 8 Ð 8 Ð ÐÌà0 œ àà Ü àà œ àà0 ø œ Ð œ Ð à(b)à0 8 ø Ð ø Ð àthe€benefits€to€be€provided€under€the€pension€plan€to€members,Ð „ Ðformer€members€and€other€persons;Ð à P 8 Ð 8 Ð ÐÌà0 œ àà Ü àà œ àà0 ø œ Ð œ Ð àÔ_ Ô(cÔ_ Ô)à0 8 ø Ð ø Ð àthe€methods€of€allocating€and€distributing€the€assets€of€theÐ x è Ðpension€plan€and€determining€the€priorities€for€payment€ofÐ D ´ Ðbenefits;€andÐ !€ 8 Ð 8 Ð ÐÌà0 œ àà Ü àà œ àà0 ø œ Ð œ Ð à(d)à0 8 ø Ð ø Ð àsuch€other€information€as€is€prescribed.Ð ¨" " 8 Ð 8 Ð ÐÌà0 œ àà Ü àà œ àà ø à(2)€No€payment€shall€be€made€out€of€the€pension€fund€in€respect€ofÐ @$° $ Ðwhich€notice€of€proposal€to€wind€up€has€been€given€until€theÐ %| % ÐSuperintendent€has€approved€the€wind€up€report.Ð Ø%H & œ Ð œ Ð ÐÌà0 œ àà Ü àà œ àà ø à(3)€Subsection€(2)€does€not€apply€to€prevent€continuation€of€paymentÐ p'à ( Ðof€a€pension€or€any€other€benefit€the€payment€of€which€commenced€beforeÐ