cbr – -Translation – Keybot Dictionary

Spacer TTN Translation Network TTN TTN Login Deutsch Français Spacer Help
Source Languages Target Languages
Keybot 3 Results  csc.lexum.org
  Cour suprême du Canada ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
Voir aussi R.W.S. Johnston, «Receivers», L.S.U.C. Special Lectures (1961) 101, à la p. 105. Le commentaire dans l’arrêt Wescana précité, à la p. 204, paraît contredire sur ce point l’arrêt de la Cour d’appel en l’espèce: voir (1979), 29 CBR 276 à la p. 283.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine csc.lexum.org as primary domain
agent of Xyloid but simply as an officer of the court in the discharge of its responsibilities under the order of appointment. See Falconbridge on Mortgages, 4th ed. (1977), pp. 759-60, quoted with approval by the Manitoba Court of Appeal in International Woodworkers of America, Local 1-324 v. Wescana Inn Ltd. and Clarkson Company Limited[12], at p. 204. See also R.W.S. Johnston, “Receivers”, L.S.U.C. Special Lectures (1961) 101, at p. 105. This comment in the Wescana judgment, supra, at p. 204, seems at odds on this point with the judgment of the Court of Appeal in this case: see (1979), 29 CBR 276 at p. 283.
  Cour suprême du Canada ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
; Clarkson Co. v. Overland Finance Corpn. [1963] 1 OR 431, 4 CBR (NS) 186, réformant [1961] O.W.N. 371, 3 CBR (NS) 94 et a jugé que l’art. 12(1) de cette loi était abrogé par l’art. 64 de la Loi sur la faillite.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine csc.lexum.org as primary domain
The Court of Appeal of Ontario again considered the Assignments and Preferences Act, RSO, 1960, ch. 25, in Re Shelly Films Ltd.; Clarkson Co. v. Overland Finance Corpn. [1963] 1 OR 431, 4 CBR (NS) 186, reversing [1961] OWN 371, 3 CBR (NS) 94, and held that sec. 12(1) of that Act was abrogated by sec. 64 of the Bankruptcy Act. Because no mention was made of the amendment to the Bankruptcy Act in that case, we are asked to assume that it had been overlooked and was not considered by that court. Judicial comity would make one hesitate to impute to the court of another province such an oversight. The case does point out the conflicts in the two Acts and it is much more reasonable to assume that the amendment was in fact considered by the court.
  Cour suprême du Canada ...  
Show textShow cached sourceOpen source URL
; Clarkson Co. v. Overland Finance Corpn. [1963] 1 OR 431, 4 CBR (NS) 186, réformant [1961] O.W.N. 371, 3 CBR (NS) 94 et a jugé que l’art. 12(1) de cette loi était abrogé par l’art. 64 de la Loi sur la faillite.
Compare text pagesCompare HTM pagesOpen source URLOpen target URLDefine csc.lexum.org as primary domain
The Court of Appeal of Ontario again considered the Assignments and Preferences Act, RSO, 1960, ch. 25, in Re Shelly Films Ltd.; Clarkson Co. v. Overland Finance Corpn. [1963] 1 OR 431, 4 CBR (NS) 186, reversing [1961] OWN 371, 3 CBR (NS) 94, and held that sec. 12(1) of that Act was abrogated by sec. 64 of the Bankruptcy Act. Because no mention was made of the amendment to the Bankruptcy Act in that case, we are asked to assume that it had been overlooked and was not considered by that court. Judicial comity would make one hesitate to impute to the court of another province such an oversight. The case does point out the conflicts in the two Acts and it is much more reasonable to assume that the amendment was in fact considered by the court.